Good Enough IT Risk Management

Why You Should Be Carrying Out a Risk Assessment

[fa icon="calendar'] Saturday, 08 July 2017 / by Jakob Holm Hansen under ISO 27001, Risk management

[fa icon="comment"] 0 comments

Most organisations know that performing a risk assessment is good practice. However, not all organisation actually do risk assessments, and those who do, often approach them in the wrong way. All too often, risk assessments are treated as a project that can be finished and that will be that, whereas the reality is that risk assessment and risk treatment are an ongoing process.

Risk Assessment And Risk Treatment Are a Process

Risk assessment is a process, not a one-off project. The reasons for this can be boiled down to these three points:

More [fa icon="long-arrow-right"]

Risk Assessments - What are they for?

[fa icon="calendar'] Monday, 27 June 2016 / by Jakob Holm Hansen under Risk assessments, risk treatment, Risk management

[fa icon="comment"] 0 comments

It is now considered good practice to perform risk assessments - or at very least to acknowledge that they should be done.

Unfortunately, far too often we see that businesses only conduct risk assessments in order to satisfy some sort of compliance requirement or other types of requirements (audit, contract, statute etc.). If you are lucky, you might have the resources to conduct them once per year. 

Typically, you will conduct your risk assessment, speak with your organisation and then finally you submit a fancy report. And then your "project" is done. However, it would be wrong to consider the risk assessment as a project. Risk assessments should be a process. It is a process that involves feedback and continual adjustments.

More [fa icon="long-arrow-right"]

Hacking online meetings

[fa icon="calendar'] Monday, 09 November 2015 / by Lars Neupart under Information risk management, Risk assessments, Risk management

[fa icon="comment"] 0 comments

By Gaffri Johnson, Neupart

Why risks related to information sharing via calendars and online meeting tools should be included in your annual it risk assessment.

More [fa icon="long-arrow-right"]

Risk assessment is a process - 3 reasons to do it again (and again)

[fa icon="calendar'] Friday, 10 July 2015 / by Lars Neupart under Information risk management, Risk assessments, Risk management

[fa icon="comment"] 0 comments

Information security risk assessments are an integral part of managing information security. Unfortunately, it is not uncommon for businesses to consider risk assessment as something they need to get over with in order to meet certain requirements. 

More [fa icon="long-arrow-right"]

Why in the world should managers be interested in information security?

[fa icon="calendar'] Wednesday, 25 February 2015 / by Charlotte Colding under business continuity, compliance, it security audit, information security, ISO 27001, Best practice, Information Security Management, security requirements, ISMS, cyber attack, Risk management

[fa icon="comment"] 0 comments

You should be involved in security since security means something to your customers and because cyber attacks and security incidents are beginning to occur within all kinds of businesses. We have all seen the numerous examples of data breaches, attacks and other security incidents in the news. Often, one might expect or hope the involved organisations were better protected then they actually were. Information security is very much on the agenda, both in the business world and in the media.

Your customers, regardless of whether you sell directly to customers or to other businesses, are presently interested in the topic. That is why you as a manager and a senior executive should take an interest in whether your organisation is sufficiently prepared for a major cyber attack or a systems crash. That should be as good an argument as any! However, there are even more good reasons that I would like to share with you.

Brand image and profitability: Perhaps you have spent years slowly but surely building credibility for your brand name(s). You want your customer to have confidence in you. One security incident can quickly serve to reduce the trust and confidence you have gained to such a degree that even the best (or most expensive) image campaign will not be able to bring it back.

Fees: Add to this the enormous costs to you when you need to deal with a major security breach. Such costs are incurred both due to the incident itself and the following investigation, cleanup and restoration. Theft of company secrets and/or intellectual property rights, as well as industrial espionage can obviously be expensive and even a threat to the very existence of some companies. Afterward, it will surely be shown that more investment in preventive security measures would have made good sense and would have saved money. Moreover, since the threat will continue to develop, it would be a good investment for the future as well.

Legal Statutes: You are subject to certain legal requirements demanding that you have a sufficient level of information security. Bear in mind present and future Personal Data Acts. The future EU personal data legislation (an ordinance) is expected to passed so that it will apply in all EU Member States. It provides for companies to pay fines of perhaps as much as 5% of their turnover for computer security breaches. There is a comprehensive requirement that the parties be notified (data breach notification), which is both expensive and difficult to perform. Add to this a number of industry-specific requirements: for example, that financial enterprises must comply with financial supervisory authorities' requirements concerning information security, requirements placed on the energy sector, the health sector and for state-run enterprises to comply with the ISO 27001 standard.

Governance Requirements: Corporate governance requirements determine 1) that management set out the procedures necessary for risk management and internal inspections, 2) that the administration take a position on strategic and commercial risks and 3) that managers who negligently has caused the company to suffer damages shall pay compensation for such damages. In other words, there is also an array of legislative reasons to be interested in information security.

Review: You likely also strive for your review to be consistent with most of everything that might be found in those long review guidelines. Your information security will also be reviewed. Keep in mind as well, that regardless of the fact that accounting firms play a dubious double role (at the same time offering a wide range of both executive and advisory consultancy services within the field of information security), it pays for you to prepare for the review proactively. It should be easy for you to document that you are in control of your information security.

However, what should you as an executive do, in addition to taking an interest in the topic? Easy: You should A) communicate to your organisation that security is important, that it is a basic condition for your business activities and b) you should investigate whether you have allocated sufficient financial and human capital in your organisation to deal with the everyday, practical management of your information security.

If you want to get a little bit deeper into the subject, I recommend you examine your maturity level in these areas:

  1. Policies, rules, procedures and documentation

  2. Risk management (risk assessment and continual risk treatment)

  3. Incident management and contingency plans

Proper governance and management of information security has become a common best practice simply because it has become a necessary condition for most commercial activities. That is why a manager should be interested in information security.

 

PS I have summarized the six reasons for you in this document here

 

PS: Click here to follow us on LinkedIn

More [fa icon="long-arrow-right"]

How does the ISO 27001:2013 affect your risk management process?

[fa icon="calendar'] Monday, 29 July 2013 / by Charlotte Colding under ISO 27001, Information Security Standards, Information risk management, ISMS, Risk management, SecureAware, ISO 27001 revision, ISO 27005

[fa icon="comment"] 0 comments

ISO / IEC 27001 was introduced in 2005 and has become a very popular international standard. Now ISO 27001 is being revised and a new version is due later in 2013. I’ve looked at the changes before and outlined the main differences between the old and the new version.

More [fa icon="long-arrow-right"]

Six questions about the ISO 27001 revision (with answers)

[fa icon="calendar'] Tuesday, 30 April 2013 / by Kristian Bøg Frandsen under ISO 27001, NIST SP 800-53, Information risk management, BrightTalk, Risk management

[fa icon="comment"] 0 comments

How does the ISO 27001 revision impact your risk management?

More [fa icon="long-arrow-right"]

Good enough IT risk management

The Neupart blog offers advice and knowledge of effective information security management, security strategies, risk management, compliance with information security standards and other requirements, business continuity planning, ISO2700x, EU Data Protection Regulation, PCI DSS, etc.

Popular Posts