It is not just a huge help for general management when company risk assessments are based around concrete business goals. Business-based risk assessments also help information security managers to prioritise what scarce resources they have.
It is now considered good practice to perform risk assessments - or at very least to acknowledge that they should be done.
Unfortunately, far too often we see that businesses only conduct risk assessments in order to satisfy some sort of compliance requirement or other types of requirements (audit, contract, statute etc.). If you are lucky, you might have the resources to conduct them once per year.
Typically, you will conduct your risk assessment, speak with your organisation and then finally you submit a fancy report. And then your "project" is done. However, it would be wrong to consider the risk assessment as a project. Risk assessments should be a process. It is a process that involves feedback and continual adjustments.
By Gaffri Johnson, Neupart
Why risks related to information sharing via calendars and online meeting tools should be included in your annual it risk assessment.
Information security risk assessments are an integral part of managing information security. Unfortunately, it is not uncommon for businesses to consider risk assessment as something they need to get over with in order to meet certain requirements.
Cloud computing promises many benefits. Cost reductions, improved efficiency and improved security is what many companies can gain from moving into the cloud.
IT outsourcing can be a highly positive experience.
Information security standards have at least two characteristics: 1) they can cure most sleep problems and 2) some describe a relatively perfect world where those responsible for information security have plenty of time and where there are enough resources to analyse needs and document decisions. Even though I may have started this post a little sarcastic, I'm actually a big supporter of standards and "best practice"; I see no reason to reinvent good stuff. I cannot do anything about the standards being boring, but I write this post to suggest some responsible shortcuts to a good start on risk assessments and as a pragmatic approach to ISO 27001 compliance (should you want that).